Responsible
Firearms Ownership 
|
|
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 08:53:35 -0500 jeff loveless <jlove@seark.net>
writes:
Bruce,
I'm curious. When you get time could
you explain to me
what you mean by the last part of your sig, as quoted below ?
jeff
>> Bruce Chesley wrote:
>> Treason for $$$: ALL "pro 2A" orgs.
>Bruce Chesley wrote:
>
>> I have been a member in ALL the leading
allegedly pro 2A
>> orgs. I became an nra Lifer before I knew that they have
>> been the longest and biggest gun control promoter. I was
>> a jpfo Founder in 1989 and became its MA Field Rep. then its
>> New England Field Rep. until 1998, when I discovered that
>> zelman had financially ripped me off. I had concluded by 1992
that
>> zelman was lying about wanting to genuinely "destroy gun control".
>> Former jpfo Research Director, Jay Simkin, and former jpfo Director,
>> Alan Rice, had concluded the same by 1993. So have several
>> others.
>> Re the nra treason: Obtain the
March 1968 American Rifleman
>> and read the article beginning on page 22. Summarily, then
nra
>> president, frank orth, admits that "the nra was originally founded
>> to promote workable gun control laws (sic)". The congressional
>> public record documents their pro gun control testimony FOR the
>> 1934 nfa, 1936 ffa and the 1968 gca, just to name a few. Contact
>> your local library or the Library Of Congress in DC, and ask for
the
>> Federal Repository near you. Contact them and ask for the
public
>> congressional testimony for the aforementioned laws. Note
who
>> from the nra says what. Via www.discountbooks.com, obtain
the
>> book "Gun Control" by Robert J. Kukla, edited for publication by
>> Harlon Carter - yes, THE Harlon Carter. Read this book.
>> To summarize all orgs. They
ALL use the same formula to make
>> money while being ineffective. Politicians and the informed
know
>> this. ALL these organization have known for a very long time,
how
>> to wage the right war to restore the 2A, and they have refused to
>> do so. WHY ??? While Americans view these organizations
as
>> "the great defenders", they are in reality, BUSINESSES. BUSINESSES
>> stay in BUSINESS by creating and maintaining the need for their
>> product(s) and / or service(s). I submit to you that increasing
>> anti weapons laws have been excellent for BUSINESS.
>> You may be familiar with the statement
"When they (government)
>> call for confiscation, that will be the final line drawn in the
sand !!!"
>> Well, Jeff, I hope you're sitting down. That "final line in
the sand"
>> happened with the 1934 nfa, which the nra willfully conspired with
>> congress to write, lobby for it get it passed, enacted and administered.
>> Since the 1934 nfa, the "mopping up campaign" has been well under
>> way. Don't believe me ? Obtain Blacks Law Dictionary
at your local
>> library or court house law library. Look up the legal terms
"de facto"
>> and "confiscation" and THINK about what you just read. I did
and sent
>> my inquiry to Constitutional Attorney, Larry Becraft. If you
are
>> familiar with the pro American movement, then you know who Attorney
>> Becraft is. He agreed with me that de facto confiscation is
in
>> effect. So where was the next American Revolution ?
It never
>> happened.
>> The bottom line is "If anti weapons
laws went away, how would all
>> these, inmost cases, highly salaried and perked org. officers and
>> employees make the same or better income and perks elsewhere ?"
>> And no, the usual knee jerk answer about promoting ownership and
>> training, is NOT the answer. The fact is they would NOT be
able to
>> make that much money.
>>
>> Bruce Chesley
>> Truth is a terrible cross to bear.
>> Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered.". Thomas Paine
>> Treason for $$$: ALL "pro 2A" orgs.
>>
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 13:19:58 -0500 jeff loveless <jlove@seark.net>
writes:
>Bruce,
>
>You have certainly provided me with a different view of some of the
2A
>groups. I will check the sources you mention and read what I
can
>find. At this point, being "for" the NRA and GOA is very deeply
ingrained, but
>I am open minded and more interested in the truth than blind loyalty
to any
>group. In fact, I would like to include your email or a detailed
article
>from you, on my web site, with your permission of course. It
would either
>help educate people (like me) or stimulate debate. Or both!
Either way,
>truth has a way of being outed. The page where I would like
to place
>your information is:
>
>http://www.seark.net/~jlove/issues.htm
>
>where it would be in a searchable database. My 'homepage' is
at
>
>http://www.seark.net/~jlove/firearms.htm
>
>Consider writing an article describing your position and I will gladly
>add it to my page. Or, if you have already written or published
a similar
>article, perhaps I could link to it.
>
>What you have to say should be read and I would like to have it on
my
>website. Again, only with your permission.
>
>jeff
>
If you would like to post our cross thread onto your website,
then you may do so AS IS with the understanding that this
information represents the tip of the iceberg. I have other
information that I am researching and verifying.
If you have any questions or comments, please
feel free
to email them to me.
Sincerely,
Bruce Chesley
Truth is a terrible cross to bear.
Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered.". Thomas Paine
Treason for $$$: ALL "pro 2A" orgs.
Mr. Chesley may be reached at Bruce Chesley <excalibur25@juno.com>
Jeff Loveless