|
|
Gun ownership an individual
right, Ashcroft writes NRA
By Karen Gullo
Associated Press
May 23, 2001
WASHINGTON -- Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft,
responding to a question by the National Rifle
Association, reasserted his belief that the
Constitution guarantees people the right to own
guns.
"While some have argued that the 2nd
Amendment guarantees only a `collective' right
of the States to maintain militias, I believe the
amendment's plain meaning and original intent
prove otherwise," he said.
Ashcroft reiterated his views in a letter May 17
to James Jay Baker, the NRA's executive
director. The NRA had written Ashcroft in
April, asking his position on the 2nd
Amendment.
Gun rights advocates accused the Clinton
administration of trying to undermine 2nd
Amendment rights, pointing to arguments
government lawyers made in a federal lawsuit
against a Texas man, Timothy Joe Emerson. He
had been indicted for violating a 1994 law
barring people under restraining orders from
having guns.
Emerson argued that the 1994 law violated his
2nd Amendment rights. A Republican-appointed
judge agreed and dismissed the charge. In an
appeal, the Justice Department argued that the
2nd Amendment does not extend to an
individual the right to keep and bear arms.
In a letter last August, former Solicitor General
Seth Waxman said government lawyers "did
indeed take the position that the 2nd
Amendment does not extend an individual right
to keep and bear arms."
"That position is consistent with the view of the
Amendment taken both by the federal appellate
courts and successive administrations," Waxman
wrote.
Waxman said the Supreme Court and eight
appellate courts "have uniformly rejected
arguments that it extends firearms rights to
individuals independent of the collective need to
ensure a well-regulated militia."
In his letter to the NRA, Ashcroft took the
opposite view, saying that in decisions dating to
the 1890s, the Supreme Court "routinely
indicated that the right protected by the 2nd
Amendment applied to individuals."
More recently, he said, the U.S. attorney general
in 1934 adopted this view, as did Congress and
President Ronald Reagan in 1986.
Ashcroft would not comment in his letter on the
Emerson case, a copy of which was obtained
Tuesday by The Associated Press. Justice
Department officials, speaking on condition of
anonymity, said the department does not plan to
make additional arguments in the case, which is
pending before a three-judge appellate panel.
Government lawyers would look at the panel's
ruling before deciding whether to appeal to the
Supreme Court, officials said, adding that
Ashcroft thinks the 1994 law is a reasonable
restraint on 2nd Amendment rights.
Baker said the NRA always asks new
administrations to state a position on the 2nd
Amendment. He characterized his letter to
Ashcroft as routine.
"We always ask the new folks to give their
opinion on what the 2nd Amendment means,"
Baker said.
Ashcroft's answer pleased the NRA. "It was
clear from the campaign and from Ashcroft's
letter that the Bush administration respects the
individual right embodied in the 2nd
Amendment," Baker said.
The NRA backed President Bush during last
year's election, spending more than $1 million
on behalf of his campaign.
Bush and Ashcroft advocate better enforcement
of gun laws as opposed to adoption of new gun
legislation. Last week the administration
disclosed plans to mobilize federal and local
prosecutors to focus exclusively on crimes
involving firearms.